Musings from Mars » Monopoly Damage

White House Freezes IT Projects To Revisit Wasteful IT Contracting

admin — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:39:39 +0000

Google Ditching Windows?

admin — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 21:06:29 +0000

Government Going Apple?

admin — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:15:01 +0000

Judge Bans Sales of Microsoft Word, Says MS Stole Code

admin — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:48:11 +0000

A Gift for Self-Deception

admin — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:50:41 +0000

For a long time now, I've been explaining why the world would have been better off if Apple's computers had come to dominate homes and businesses. I've focused on the virtues of Apple's software almost exclusively, even though Apple has for most of existence been primarily a hardware company, like Dell or Hewlett Packard. Why? Because it's clear to all us Martians that what makes or breaks a computing experience is the software. To paraphrase one of your ex-Presidents, "It's the Software, stupid!" I've also come to believe that humans are genetically predisposed to self-deception, allowing them to talk themselves into whatever point of view is most convenient, or is perceived as being in their best self-interest. Thus, argument over the relative worth of one technology or another is pointless, because no carefully researched and supported set of facts will ever be enough to persuade someone with the opposite view. Indeed, the truth of this axiom is encapsulated in the common human phrase of folk wisdom,

"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink."

I've noted that when someone conjures this phrase to explain a colleague or acquaintance's intransigence about something, those listening will nod to each other knowingly and somewhat sadly aver, "So true." And yet, how many humans really think they're as "stupid" as horses?

Apple a Monopolist? Only in Microsoft-Think

admin — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:07:32 +0000

I recently read another positive article about Apple in Computerworld, this one covering Apple's 5 Biggest Moments in 2008. Unlike some other Apple coverage in Computerworld, this one was largely a yawn, but don't you know that most of the comments (as usual) were from Windows partisans who were simply angry that Apple was given any positive coverage at all!

Recently, that seems to be the standard for virtually any online article that has something nice to say about Apple. Rather than commenting on the substance of the article, some anti-Apple type will immediately start dissing the company in a totally ignorant and offensive manner. Sometimes, such drivel will be met with commenters defending Apple, but quite often it merely attracts other Apple hecklers.

The Computerworld article cited above was no different, but there was one comment from a guy who, though claiming to have some positive feelings about Apple, levels a charge that comes straight from the Microsoft propaganda machine. This propaganda only started a few years ago, when Apple began to have success with non-computer products like iTunes, the iPod, and now the iPhone. Microsoft loved to spread the word that Apple's products were all "closed," while Microsoft's were "open," and many listeners, without actually thinking about this illogical line of thinking, bought the propaganda and are now spreading it themselves.

I just couldn't let this challenge go unanswered, so I didn't. The following is what I published in response on Computerworld. In a nutshell, it explains why this guy's line of reasoning is bunk, and why, no matter how much Microsoft would like folks to think so, Apple is absolutely not a monopolist in any sense of the term.

Virtually Every Windows PC at Risk from Malware

admin — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:54:56 +0000

Computerworld: Microsoft looks to mimic Apple success, says Ballmer

admin — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:26:13 +0000

A Desperate Microsoft Tries To Talk the iPhone To Death

admin — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:34:43 +0000

Gartner Raises Hopes That Microsoft Will Die (Without Yahoo)

admin — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:33:26 +0000

Mac Hack Makes for Good Headlines, But…

admin — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:01:01 +0000

Microsoft admits it knew about, didn’t patch, bugs

admin — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:29:10 +0000

Daring Fireball: Microsoft Still Relying on Nasty FUD Rather Than Actual Competition

admin — Sat, 05 May 2007 20:36:51 +0000

Ars Technica Predicts Microsoft’s Silverlight Will Kill Flash

admin — Tue, 01 May 2007 23:20:10 +0000

Slashdot: Microsoft Accused of Bait-and-Switch in Vista Marketing

admin — Wed, 04 Apr 2007 05:50:16 +0000

Mac OS X Spreadsheet Roundup: A Few Excel, The Rest Should Be Shot

admin — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:26:27 +0000

It's a common myth in the Windows world that Mac users have to make do with only one software title for every 10 that run on Windows. The myth arises from the teeny-tiny or nonexistent retail space afforded to Mac software in the computer stores where Windows users shop. However, the reality is far from that perception. Prior to the emergence of Mac OS X, Mac users did commonly face slim pickings in many software categories, but times have changed dramatically, and nowadays many software categories present so many choices for Mac users that the situation is downright uncomfortable. I certainly feel that way at times! One of these days, I'm going to do a study of the comparative availability of software titles between Mac OS X and Windows, and my going-in assumption will be that users have an equivalent or greater degree of choice on the Mac platform today in categories such as

personal information management
personal organizers
graphic design tools
3D design and animation tools
image management tools
project management
word processing tools
programmers text editors
Music mixing and editing tools
News aggregators (RSS/podcast readers), and
many others.

Notice that not all of the categories I'm listing are in the realm of creative arts. However, one category that's still under-served, in my view, is the original killer app, the good-old spreadsheet. I haven't researched the Windows market for spreadsheet software, so perhaps the same dilemma affects those guys, too. Undoubtedly, the underwhelming selection of spreadsheets for Mac OS X results directly from the influence of Microsoft Office, and what is probably its best component, Microsoft Excel. In this article, I'll review all of the applications that provide spreadsheet-type functionality for Mac OS X, and as you'll see, not many will come through with flying colors.

Spread The Word: Al Gore Used Keynote For “Inconvenient Truth”… NOT PP

admin — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:25:25 +0000

New Microsoft Dirty Tricks Revealed (Slashdot/Cringely)

admin — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:29:16 +0000

Bill Gates Still Telling Hitler-Style Big Lies

admin — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 22:21:18 +0000

AppleInsider: Vista dawns, world yawns

Leland Scott — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 02:03:59 +0000

Slashdot: Microsoft Copies Idea, Admits It, Then Patents It

admin — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:25:26 +0000

Did You Know That 99.9% of South Korean Computers Run Windows?

admin — Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:02:15 +0000

Microsoft Really Thinks of Developers As Pawns and One-Night Stands

admin — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:40:02 +0000

Still Seeking Freedom From Quicken: Alternative Personal Finance Apps for Mac OS X

admin — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:31:16 +0000

I've been using Quicken on my Mac for over 10 years now. Quicken came free with the very first Mac I bought back in 1996, and having nothing else to compare it against, it seemed like a pretty good thing. Sure, it was buggy, and as time went by I realized it was just a pale shadow of the version Intuit was providing to its Windows customers. But it definitely was saving my wife and I time at the end of the month in paying bills and reconciling the checkbook.

By now, I've grown accustomed to Quicken's face, but unlike Henry Higgins' statement in My Fair Lady, that's not a compliment. I hate Quicken's face, in fact, and I detest the continued second-citizen status Quicken consigns me to in the world of personal finance. That's not totally Intuit's fault, but they haven't done a good job of improving Mac users' lot much over time. I guess I should feel lucky that I can connect online and automatically download transactions from my bank. Too bad I can't do the same with the mutual fund company where I have my IRA money. The worst thing about Quicken's face is the total absence of control over all the windows that get spawned. You think the Finder is bad? Then you haven't spent much time in Quicken! Fortunately, I use WindowShade to keep my account windows from taking over, but do you know what? Quicken can't remember from session to session where I've left my windows, or in what state I left them. This means I have to spend a minute or so each time I open the damn software to rearrange all those windows. What fun! :-{ The next worst thing is the incomprehensible set of menus and toolbar items. Quicken's interface appears to have grown like the suburbs of most U.S. cities in the last few decades---that is, totally without order, logic, or aesthetics of any sort. This is probably why I never venture far when I enter QuickenLand... Just do my checkbook, pay a few bills, update a few stock prices, and get the hell out of there. Naturally, Quicken has no concept of the Mac OS X Cocoa framework, so all the neat little user interface utilities I use in my other Mac apps don't work here... or they work with a jerk. Application services? Ha! Automator actions or Spotlight support? Ha Ha! Intuit has made no attempt whatsoever to keep Quicken up to date with the latest and greatest Mac OS X technologies, and if I'm a typical customer, I can understand why. I'm so locked into Quicken that it's almost painful contemplating my escape. Not only do I have the last 10 years of financial data locked in there, but I also spent a lot of time early on entering all my data back to the early 1980's. Some of my investment account data go back even further than that. I know that some Mac customers have gotten free, but I also know they probably had to spend a lot of time digging themselves out. And once they were out, did they feel like Neo waking up outside the Matrix? Lord, I hope not! So I've been keeping a close eye on the various personal finance packages that are available for the Mac. In the last 2 years, there have finally been a few apps that looked interesting enough to do more than just open them, take a quick look around, and leave. I've now tried four of them and have at least four more to go. As I finish the trials, I'll keep this article updated on my prospects for a Quicken escape.